- Follow HabsWorld
- Must Read
- Latest HW Forum Topics
Montreal vs. San Jose | March 8th, 2014 | 10:00 EST
Started on: 08 March 2014 - 12:31 PM - 82 replies
Mar. 6, Montreal vs Phoenix, 9 PM
Started on: 06 March 2014 - 10:14 AM - 86 replies
Vanek traded to Montreal
Started on: 05 March 2014 - 03:19 PM - 185 replies
29 Habs Fans are currently browsing the HabsWorld Forums. Join the discussion!
As you all know by now, the Habs made a coaching change on Saturday, replacing Jacques Martin with assistant coach Randy Cunneyworth. Although it didn't pay immediate dividends in a 5-3 loss that night, there is hope that Cunneyworth can turn things around. Do our writers feel the same way? Here are our thoughts on the matter.
Matt Dilworth: To be honest, this firing floored me. Martinís dismissal had been long-rumoured (and fervently wished for) by some, but without an adequate francophone replacement available, I figured Martinís job would be safe for the rest of the season. But it seems that the Molsons have okayed an English-speaking coach for the time being, and this may open the door for a larger pool of candidates in the future.
Will Martinís dismissal help the Canadiens? It is no secret that Martin kept his club thinking defence-first, and this logically stunted any offensive potential. This was due in part to Martinís style, and the fact that Montrealís blue-line has been regularly decimated by injury for the past few years. That being said, there were rumours of some key players being unhappy with their offense being stifled, and perhaps the team could benefit from Randy Cunneyworth opening things up. I certainly hope that the younger players get more chances under the new coach, and that certain veterans that seemed to get a free pass under Martin will be held accountable for their performances.
All in all, I look forward to seeing what direction the Canadiens take in the post-Martin era, and hope to see a more successful, exciting brand of hockey. It would be unfair to diminish all the good Martin accomplished over the past few seasons, and I remain doubtful that many other coaches could have done better, given the injuries.
George Kouniakis: I have to admit with a little embarrassment that my first reaction was somewhere between excitement and joy. And my second reaction was guilt; guilt that I found myself so pleased that a man had lost his job. I am the first to admit that I was never excited by Martin's hiring. I don't think I am unique among Habs fans for wanting my team to win, but with offensive flair. Having said that, I didn't have any problems with Martin's coaching during the 2010 playoffs. Jacques Martin is a good coach who gets good results more often than not. To not acknowledge this would just be stubborn and deluded. But I do think that a coaching change was necessary, and my primary reason for thinking this is Mike Cammalleri.
It is something that has been true of most of the Habs veterans this season, but I think it is most apparent with Cammalleri; he has been underachieving and we know he is capable of more. Something about his game just seems... off. Mike Cammalleri is a goal scorer, and this season he is not scoring goals. I recently have been asking myself if he had become frustrated with a system that does not allow his skills to flourish. It is easy for players to talk about how winning is more important than individual statistics or accomplishments, but it certainly becomes more difficult when the team stops winning. Based on some of the speculation that has come out in the media coverage since Martin's dismissal, it seems I was not the only one asking these questions. It was becoming more obvious that members of the team were frustrated. When this happens, eventually something has to change. And if you cannot move players because their output does not correlate with their contract, then you move the coach. That, as they say, is just the way it is.
Brian La Rose: First off, count me among the surprised with this announcement, especially after learning Cunneyworth would be replacing Martin. Though they have different personalities, both coaches preach defensive accountability first and foremost which leaves me skeptical we'll see any real notable 'culture change.' If that winds up being the case, they may have been better off with the status quo; we'll see in five to six months from now. For years, fans yearned for an experienced coach and pretty much from the minute Martin arrived, yearned for 'new blood.' Cunneyworth is a rookie NHL head coach but has a strong foundation of coaching experience to draw from, more than a lot of the Habs' previous hires which is reason for tempered optimism.
The more interesting issue is the situation that now presents itself with regards to GM Pierre Gauthier. Not being allowed to hire a more permanent coach could mean he soon will be out the door as well. Truth be told, I think he's done a pretty good job overall, more acquisitions have panned out than haven't but that doesn't appear to be enough to save his job barring a midseason turnaround by the team. This begs the question, "Why was he allowed to do this even?" Unless the team gets going in the next six weeks (and with the continued injuries, that's far from a given even with the coaching change), I'd say there's a pretty good chance Bob Gainey will be taking the team through the trade deadline to set things up for an offseason replacement, similar to what Toronto did with Cliff Fletcher a few years back.
So what have Saturday's events brought us? A GM who may very well need approval from higher up to do much of anything more to the roster and a coach that, barring a miracle, may very well be out the door almost as fast as he walked through it, especially with the predictable media storm that has taken place with regards to the linguistic side of coaching that is only relevant in this market. (Anyone who has read my writing on this site over the past eight years knows my feelings about that, they need not be repeated here.) The Habs appear to have went from having a coach and GM on thin ice...to a coach and GM on thinner ice. I know midseason changes don't always bring about stability but could the team really be in any more of a tenuous situation now? Not exactly the thoughts of a brighter future that a new coach is supposed to bring. Good luck, Randy. You're going to need it.
Louis Moustakas: If you want to impose a change in the team's culture, it cannot be done in half-measures like it has been this season. Assistant Coach Perry Pearn was fired earlier this season but retained as a scout. Then Jacques Martin was let go only to be replaced by another assistant coach, Randy Cunneyworth. Meanwhile, Larry Carriere descends from the front office into a coaching position as well.
Bob Gainey, who groomed Pierre Gauthier as his successor, remains with the team as a consultant. Clement Jodoin, previously an assistant with the Canadiens, coaches the farm team. Patrick Boivin, former President Pierre Boivin's son, is in an upper management position as well.
The point here is not to indict the skill or professionalism of any of the above men, or to suggest they should be dismissed. Rather, it is to illustrate the pointlessness of firing the head coach when so much remains of what increasingly looks like a dysfunctional franchise. Constant retention and promotion from within only serves to propagate an organizational culture that has failed to produce on-ice results for the better part of two decades.
True change will only come when Geoff Molson takes an objective, tough and thorough look at each member of his organization.
Jonathan Rebelo: At the beginning of the season, I would have told you there is almost no way Jacques could get fired; even after the Canadiens only had 1 win in their first 8 games I still thought he was secure in his job. Jacques, as many questioned in the days and weeks leading to his firing, did have some players quit on him. This was clear in the player interviews after the news broke. Josh Gorges among others brought this up of course without pointing fingers.
To me the decision to fire him is probably useless for the fact that his replacement will offer more of the same in terms of a ďsystem.Ē Hopefully he can be more willing to adapt and change during a game. Cunneyworth was a disciple of Jacques Martin as a player and a coach. However, I do believe it is possible the team will be better with him as they may be healthier. The return of Andrei Markov should it ever happen should give the Canadiens a massive boost from the back end which could push the Habs into the top-8 in the east.
In closing I feel awful for Cunneyworth as he will be torn to shreds by the majority of the French media no matter how he does in the standings.
Please come back Nordiques, PLEASE!
Michael Richard: I don't think too many Hab fans were surprised by the news of Martin's firing. The mood was turning against him and the results were just not good enough to stem the tide. The timing of the decision does leave one to wonder whether or not the decision was solely that of Pierre Gauthier. It seems like there may have been some influence from ownership but that is something we'll never know.
Considering Randy Cunneyworth is only an interim coach the discussion inevitably turns to his replacement. Language will always be part of this debate but in the end results are all that matters. The right coach for the situation should be the only concern and if he/she is unilingual English, even the French media will accept him/her if the results are right.
Norm Szcyrek: The team has been under performing which is a huge understatement. Many of the veterans who aren't new in Montreal this season are also playing well below par, which indicates they had either tuned Jacques Martin out, not bought into his systems, or not believed in Martin's unusual "tactics" [eg. early season use of Mathieu Darche on the PP while ignoring an obvious goal scorer like Erik Cole]. Martin is not known for being a motivator or much of a communicator, but is more of an "old school" styled coach. Cunneyworth brings much more passion behind the bench than the man he replaced, and since he was an former NHLer, the veterans may listen to him better. However given that he was very close to Martin, it will remain interesting to watch if he can employ new strategies for the forwards and defence to use, to pull them out of their funk.
- HW Forum Thread - Martin fired, Cunneyworth interim coach for the rest of the year
- HW Forum Thread - Who would you pick as a long-term coach?